Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Century Indemnity Co. v. Marine Group, LLC

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

March 15, 2017

CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
THE MARINE GROUP, LLC, a California limited liability company, as affiliated with Northwest Marine, Inc.; NORTHWEST MARINE, INC., an inactive Oregon corporation, as affiliated with Northwest Marine Iron Works; NORTHWEST MARINE IRON WORKS, an inactive Oregon corporation, Defendants. THE MARINE GROUP, LLC, a California limited liability company, as affiliated with Northwest Marine, Inc.; NORTHWEST MARINE, INC., an inactive Oregon corporation, as affiliated with Northwest Marine Iron Works; NORTHWEST MARINE IRON WORKS, an inactive Oregon corporation; and BAE SAN DIEGO SHIP REPAIR, INC., a California corporation, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE COMPANY and AGRICULTURAL EXCESS AND SURPLUS INSURANCE COMPANY, each an Ohio corporation; AMERICAN CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an Iowa corporation; FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation; GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, a New Jersey corporation; INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a Pennsylvania corporation; CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, each a foreign corporation; NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a Pennsylvania corporation; NEW ENGLAND REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; PACIFIC MUTUAL MARINE OFFICE INC., a New York corporation; RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation; ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, individually and as successor to ST. PAUL MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation; TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation; WATER QUALITY INSURANCE SYNDICATE, a syndicate of foreign corporations; WEST COAST MARINE MANAGERS, INC., a New York corporation; AMERICAN MANUFACTURER'S MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; DANIELSON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, successor to MISSION NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation; FM GLOBAL INSURANCE AGENCY, successor to ARKWRIGHT BOSTON MANUFACTURER'S MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; STERLING CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, successor to NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a California corporation; and JOHN DOE INSURANCE COMPANIES, Third-Party Defendants.

          ORDER

          JOHN V. ACOSTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

         Third-party defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) and third-party plaintiffs the Marine Group, LLC, Northwest Marine, Inc., Northwest Marine Iron Works, and BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair, Inc. (collectively “Marine”) seek an order from the court relieving the parties from a provision in the Opinion and Order entered May 10, 2016 (ECF No. 950)(the “Opinion”), which addressed Marine's motion to reconsider[1] a prior ruling[2] on St. Paul's motion to compel.[3] Specifically, the parties ask the court to withdraw a provision in the Opinion limiting Marine's production of documents requested by St. Paul to attorneys and experts of St. Paul, thereby preventing the disclosure of such documents to St. Paul.

         The parties represent they have reached a settlement in principal on the restriction set forth in the relevant provision. They now jointly move for an order that the prior restriction to attorney and experts only no longer applies to St. Paul. Accordingly, based on the reported settlement in principle and joint request;

         IT IS ORDERED that the language of the Opinion set forth in the last two paragraphs of Section III found on pages 13 and 14 do not apply to St. Paul, are no longer warranted, and are hereby stricken from the Opinion.

---------

Notes:

[1]ECF No. 921

[2]ECF No. 899

[3]ECF No. 695


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.