Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Grimes v. Wong

United States District Court, D. Oregon

July 8, 2015

JEROME L. GRIMES, Plaintiff,
v.
MARY WONG; UMPQUA BANK, Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. McSHANE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, prose, brings this action against Mary Wong and Umpqua Bank seeking damages for alleged fraud, conversion, and wrongful death.[1] Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin issued a Findings and Recommendation (F&R) on June 12, 2015, in which he recommended that this Court dismiss plaintiffs third complaint without leave to amend. The matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

This Court reviews all portions of the F&R subject to objection de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Machs. Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Plaintiff timely filed an objection.[2] Upon review, this Court finds no error in Judge Coffin's F&R, ECF No. 15.

CONCLUSION

This Court ADOPTS Judge Coffin's F&R, ECF No. 15, in full. Plaintiff's third amended complaint, ECF No. 14, and fourth amended complaint, ECF No. 19, are dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.