Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Teem v. Doubravsky

United States District Court, D. Oregon

June 20, 2015

KENNETH TEEM, personal representative for Luby C. Teem, deceased, Plaintiff,
v.
CHANCE E. DOUBRAVSKY; and DENNIS E. BEEKS, dba DENNIS E. BEEKS TRUCKING, Defendants.

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNNDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation [15] on May 6, 2015, in which she recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff Kenneth Teem's motion to remand this case to state court [6]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings & Recommendation [15]. Accordingly, Teem's motion to remand [6] is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.