Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Boedigheimer v. Opel

United States District Court, D. Oregon

June 17, 2015

RICHARD LEWIS BOEDIGHEIMER, Plaintiff,
v.
SGT. DAVE OPEL, et al., Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. McSHANE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, who is incarcerated and proceeding pro se, brings this action seeking damages for alleged violation of the Fourth and Eighth Amendments under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.[1] Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a Report and Recommendation on May 22, 2015, in which he recommended that this Court grant defendants' motion for summary judgment on all claims. The matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Because no objections to the Report and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court reviews only the legal principles de novo. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon review, this Court finds no error in Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 41.

CONCLUSION

This Court ADOPTS Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 41, in full. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.