Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fish v. Peters

United States District Court, D. Oregon

May 27, 2015

CHRISTOPHER SCOTT FISH, Plaintiff,
v.
COLETTE S. PETERS, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Clark issued his Findings and Recommendation in the above-captioned case on April 9, 2015, recommending that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Upon de novo review, I find no error with Magistrate Judge Clarke's thorough analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 42) issued on April 9, 2015 is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 34) is GRANTED. This action is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.