United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 27, 2015
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT FISH, Plaintiff,
COLETTE S. PETERS, et al., Defendants.
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Clark issued his Findings and Recommendation in the above-captioned case on April 9, 2015, recommending that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Upon de novo review, I find no error with Magistrate Judge Clarke's thorough analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 42) issued on April 9, 2015 is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 34) is GRANTED. This action is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.