United States District Court, D. Oregon
April 16, 2015
WILLIAM CHAMBERS, Plaintiff,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, PAT GARRETT, and JOSH McCARTHY, Defendants.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation  on February 9, 2015, in which he recommends that this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss  Plaintiff's claims against them. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation , and therefore, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss  is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.