Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James v. Mills

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Medford Division

April 15, 2015

ALLEN LAMONT JAMES, Petitioner,
v.
DON MILLS, Respondent.

ORDER

OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#56), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation (#56). The Petition (#2) is DENIED. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No certificate of appealability shall issue as petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253 (c) (2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Court's Order adopting the Findings and Recommendations of Hon. Magistrate Judge Clarke ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.