United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nathan Lee Thomas, . Pro se.
Michael Porter, Andrea M. Barton, MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN LLP. Of Attorneys for Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Nathan Lee Thomas, pro se, filed a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. On February 17, 2015, the Court granted Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissed this action. Dkts. 58, 59. Accordingly, Defendants are the prevailing party.
On February 20, 2015, Defendants submitted their Bill of Costs, seeking $2, 058.90 in costs incurred in taking the videotaped deposition of Plaintiff. Dkt. 61. Plaintiff did not object to Defendants' Bill of Costs.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) creates a presumption that costs will be awarded to the prevailing party, but vests the district court with discretion to refuse to award costs. See Ass'n of Mexican-Am. Educators, 231 F.3d 572, 591 (9th Cir. 2000). The Court has reviewed Defendants' Bill of Costs and grants it in part. The Court finds that taking Plaintiff's deposition by video was excessive and unreasonable under the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, the Court reduces the requested costs by $876.25, the amount charged for the videotaping and DVD copies of the deposition.
Defendants' Bill of Costs (Dkt. 60) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendants are ...