United States District Court, D. Oregon
March 6, 2015
SIR GIORGIO SANFORD CLARDY, Plaintiff,
OFFICER BRIAN GAUNT, et al., Defendants.
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Clark issued his Findings and Recommendation in the above-captioned case on December 4, 2014, recommending that defendant Staton's motion to dismiss be granted and plaintiff's claims against him be dismissed. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Upon de novo review, I find no error with Magistrate Judge Clarke's thorough analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 28) issued on December 4, 2014 is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendant Staton's Motion to Dismiss (doc. 22) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims against him are hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.