Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tanner v. Hightower

United States District Court, D. Oregon

January 23, 2015

DANIEL J. TANNER, an individual, Plaintiff,
v.
VICKI HIGHTOWER, PAUL ZELLERBACH, JOHN HAWKINS and RIVERSIDE COUNTY, a subdivision of the State of California, John Does One through Ten, Defendants

Daniel J. Tanner, an individual, Plaintiff, Pro se, Pleasant Hill, OR.

For Vicki Hightower, Riverside County, a subdivision of the State of California, Defendants: Arthur K. Cunningham, LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, San Bernardino, CA; John S. Poulos, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Sacramento, CA.

For Paul Zellerbach, Defendant: Arthur K. Cunningham, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, San Bernardino, CA.

For John Hawkins, Defendant: David F. Taglienti, LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, State of California, Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA; Seth T. Karpinski, State of Oregon, Department of Justice, Salem, OR.

ORDER

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 31, 2014. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.