United States District Court, District of Oregon, Medford Division
January 20, 2015
PAUL LEIGHTON, Plaintiff,
THREE RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.
OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ-. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a' de. novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de. novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted.
Magistrate Judge Clarke-'s Report and Recommendation (#62) is adopted. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (#36) is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.