Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Leighton v. Three Rivers School District

United States District Court, District of Oregon, Medford Division

January 20, 2015

PAUL LEIGHTON, Plaintiff,
v.
THREE RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.

ORDER

OWEN M. PANNER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ-. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a' de. novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Here, Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de. novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke-'s Report and Recommendation (#62) is adopted. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (#36) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.