United States District Court, D. Oregon
MERRILL SCHNEIDER Schneider Kerr & Gibney Law Offices, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
S. AMANDA MARSHALL, United States Attorney, ADRIAN L. BROWN, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR, DAVID MORADO, Regional Chief Counsel, GERALD J. HILL Special Assistant United States Attorneys Social Security Administration, Seattle, WA, Attorneys for Defendant.
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#18) on October 8, 2014, in which she recommends the Court reverse the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and remand to the Commissioner of Social Security for an immediate award of benefits.
Defendant filed timely Objections (#20) to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ( en banc ).
Defendant raises four objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. Defendant contends the Magistrate Judge erred when she concluded the ALJ cited legally insufficient reasons to reject the opinion of Kristin Kocher, M.D., Plaintiff's long-time treating physician; when she failed to find the ALJ's rejection of Dr. Kocher's opinion was harmless error; when she applied the "credit-as-true" rule to Dr. Kocher's opinion and concluded Dr. Kocher's opinion must be credited-as-true; and when she remanded this case for an immediate award of benefits.
This Court has carefully considered Defendant's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#18) and, accordingly, REVERSES the ALJ's decision and REMANDS this matter to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of ...