Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Raybould v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

United States District Court, D. Oregon

December 11, 2014

DENNIS RAYBOULD and DIANE RAYBOULD, Plaintiffs,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., RCO LEGAL, P.C. f/k/a NORTH-WEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC., Defendants.

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, Chief District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on November 12, 2014 (doc. 40). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiffs timely filed objections (doc. 43), and defendants declined to file any response brief. I have, therefore, given the file of this case a de novo review. I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 40) granting defendants' motions to dismiss (docs. 24 and 28).

This case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.