United States District Court, D. Oregon, Medford Division
November 21, 2014
JOSHUA SHANE MARSING, Petitioner,
BRIAN BELLEQUE, Respondent.
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, Petitioner objects to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with the Report and Recommendation's conclusion that the Amended Petition should be denied.
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report. and Recommendation (#135) is adopted. The Amended Petition (#21) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.