Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fernlund v. Transcanada Usa Services Inc.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Medford Division

November 10, 2014

CARL FERNLUND, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
TRANSCANADA USA SERVICES INC. d.b.a. TRANSCANADA, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

Here, Plaintiffs object to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that Defendants' motions for summary judgment should be granted.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#106) is adopted. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (##64, 77, 91) are granted. Plaintiffs' request for judicial notice (#79) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.