United States District Court, D. Oregon, Medford Division
November 10, 2014
CARL FERNLUND, et al., Plaintiffs,
TRANSCANADA USA SERVICES INC. d.b.a. TRANSCANADA, et al., Defendants.
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, Plaintiffs object to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that Defendants' motions for summary judgment should be granted.
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#106) is adopted. Defendants' motions for summary judgment (##64, 77, 91) are granted. Plaintiffs' request for judicial notice (#79) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.