Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Quintero v. Suver

United States District Court, D. Oregon

October 15, 2014

ISMAEL QUINTERO, JR., Plaintiff,
v.
KATIE A. SUVER, Defendant.

Ismael Quintero, Jr., Salem, OR, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Michael R. Washington, Oregon Department of Justice, Salem, OR, Attorney for Defendant.

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNNDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [38] on September 22, 2014, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment [31] and dismiss the case with prejudice. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt , 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation [38]. Accordingly, Defendant's motion for summary judgment [31] is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.