United States District Court, D. Oregon
October 1, 2014
JAMES DONALD JACKSON, JR., Petitioner,
MARK NOOTH, Respondent.
James Donald Jackson, Jr. Ontario, OR, Pro Se Petitioner.
Kristen E. Boyd, Salem, OR, Attorney for Respondent.
MARCO A. HERNNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation  on April 22, 2014, in which she recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus  with prejudice. Petitioner timely filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall , 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Petitioner's objections and conclude that the objections do not provide a basis to modify the recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation . Therefore, Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus  is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.