Submitted June 18, 2014
Multnomah County Circuit Court No. 110933908, Stephen K. Bushong, Judge.
Judgment of conviction on Count 8 reversed and remanded with instructions to enter ajudgment of conviction for fourth-degree assault; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Morgen E. Daniels, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Shannon T. Reel, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Edmonds, Senior Judge.
[265 Or.App. 400] DUNCAN, P. J.
In this criminal case, defendant appeals the trial court's judgment convicting him of multiple crimes. He raises four assignments of error. We write only to address defendant's first assignment of error, in which he asserts that the trial court erred in failing to enter a judgment of acquittal on Count 8 of the indictment, which charged him with " assault in the fourth degree - constituting domestic violence" for physically injuring his stepdaughter, S. Defendant does not dispute that he assaulted S, but he does dispute that the assault constituted domestic violence. He argues that " domestic violence" is " abuse between family or household members," ORS 135.230(3), and that he and S were not " family or household members," ORS 135.230(4). The state concedes that defendant and S were not family or household members. For the reasons explained below, we agree with the parties that the trial court erred in concluding that defendant's assault of S constituted domestic violence. We reject without written discussion defendant's remaining three assignments of error. Accordingly, we reverse defendant's conviction for assault in the fourth degree constituting domestic violence and remand to the trial court for entry of a judgment of conviction for the lesser-included offense of assault in the fourth degree, and we otherwise affirm.
The relevant facts are few, and we state them in the light most favorable to the state. State v. Evans, 161 Or.App. 86, 89, 983 P.2d 1055 (1999) (when reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion for a judgment of acquittal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state). Defendant was married to Rose McKarge, but the two were estranged. McKarge lived in her own home with two of her three daughters, including S. One night, defendant went to McKarge's home, where an altercation ensued that involved McKarge, her three daughters, and the boyfriend of one of the daughters. Following the altercation, the state brought a 13-count indictment against defendant. In Count 8, which is [265 Or.App. 401] entitled " assault in the fourth degree - constituting domestic violence," the state alleged that defendant assaulted S and further alleged that, at the time of the assault, defendant was S's stepfather.
At trial, in support of Count 8, the state presented evidence that, during the altercation at McKarge's home, defendant caused physical injury to S, who was a minor. McKarge and her three daughters testified that defendant did not live at McKarge's home and was not part of their family. A jury found defendant guilty of nine of the charged counts, including Count 8.
As mentioned, on appeal, defendant challenges his conviction on Count 8 on the ground that his assault of S did not constitute " domestic violence," ORS 135.230(3), because he and S were not " family or household members," ORS 135.230(4). The state agrees that defendant and S were not " family or household members," and, for the reasons explained below, so do we.
ORS 132.586 authorizes the state to plead and prove that a crime involved ...