Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Formosa v. Great Northwest Insurance Co.

United States District Court, D. Oregon

September 4, 2014

JOSEPH and VICTORIA FORMOSA, Plaintiffs,
v.
GREAT NORTHWEST INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. McSHANE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Joseph and Victoria Formosa bring this action seeking damages for alleged breach of an insurance policy covering their home. Plaintiffs and defendant filed motions for summary judgment. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin issued a Findings and Recommendation (F & R) on July 21, 2014, in which he recommended that this Court deny plaintiffs' motion and award summary judgment to defendant on all claims except for plaintiffs' replacement structure claim.[1] The matter is now before this Court. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Because no objections to the F & R were timely filed, this Court reviews only the legal principles de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444-45 (9th Cir. 1988) (citations omitted). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, this Court finds no error in Judge Coffin's F & R, ECF No. 47.

CONCLUSION

This Court ADOPTS Judge Coffin's F & R, ECF No. 47, in full. Accordingly, plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, ECF No. 15, is DENIED, and defendant's motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 19, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.[2]

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.