United States District Court, D. Oregon
MARTHA WONG and DANIEL A. BERNATH, Plaintiffs,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security, Administration, et al., Defendants.
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
On December 16, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in this Court against Defendants alleging claims for (1) conversion/embezzlement, (2) negligent fraud, (3) intentional fraud, (4) breach of fiduciary duty, (5) replevin, (6) unfair business practices, (7) malpractice, and (8) rescission.
On February 25, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Proposed First Amended Complaint to substitute certain Defendants and to add other Defendants.
On March 4, 2014, Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation in which she found neither Plaintiffs' Complaint nor Plaintiffs' proposed First Amended Complaint sufficiently established complete diversity of citizenship between the parties. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommended the Court dismiss this matter without prejudice and with leave to file a proposed Second Amended Complaint to allege the basis for this Court's jurisdiction. The Magistrate Judge also stayed all pending Motions until the issue of this Court's jurisdiction was resolved.
On March 17, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Motion (#126) for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint.
On April 11, 2014, the Court adopted the March 4, 2014, Findings and Recommendation, dismissed Plaintiffs' Complaint and proposed First Amended Complaint without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and reserved to the Magistrate Judge the disposition of Plaintiffs' Motion (#126) for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint.
On April 14, 2014, Magistrate Judge Stewart entered an Order granting Plaintiffs leave to file a proposed Second Amended Complaint to cure the jurisdictional deficiencies.
On April 25, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a proposed Second Amended Complaint.
On June 10, 2014, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#169) in which she found Plaintiffs' proposed Second Amended Complaint fails to cure the jurisdictional defects noted in the March 4, 2014, Findings and Recommendation, and, therefore, the filing of Plaintiffs' proposed Second Amended Complaint would be futile. Thus, the Magistrate Judge recommends this Court deny Plaintiffs' Motion (#126) to File a Second Amended Complaint, deny all pending Motions as moot, and dismiss this matter with prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs filed timely Objections to the June 10, 2014, Findings and Recommendation.
On June 17, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a "Dismissal Without Prejudice as State of Oregon Action Filed" (Docket #177).
On July 11, 2014, Magistrate Judge Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#181) in which she recommended the Court grant Plaintiffs' Dismissal (#177) Without Prejudice. Defendants Randy Rosenblatt; Disability Law Office NW, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company; Mick Rosenblatt; Liela Rosenblatt; Leila R. and Milton L. Rosenblatt Living Trust; Robert Green; and Barnsley Enterprise, LLC, filed timely Objections to the July 11, 2014, Findings and Recommendation.
The June 10, 2014, and July 11, 2014, Findings and Recommendations are now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); ...