Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pringle v. State

United States District Court, D. Oregon

August 7, 2014

EUGENE DAYTON PRINGLE, JR. Plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF OREGON, JOHN KITZHABER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER, et al. Defendants.

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNNDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [56] on June 30, 2014, in which she recommends that this Court grant the Department of Interior's Motion to Dismiss [53], grant Attorney General Holder's Motion to Dismiss [54], and dismiss Mr. Pringle's Amended Complaint [4].

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt , 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation [56]. Accordingly, the Department of Interior's Motion to Dismiss [53] is granted, Attorney General Holder's Motion to Dismiss [54] is granted, and Mr. Pringle's Amended Complaint [4] is dismissed, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.