Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gonzalez v. Portland Police Bureau

United States District Court, D. Oregon

August 6, 2014

AMINADAD GONZALEZ, Plaintiff,
v.
PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU, JOHN DOE, Portland Police Chief, WILLIAM JOHNSON, HYTHUM ISMAIL, ANDREW HEARST, and CHRISTOPHER LINDSEY, Defendants.

Aminadad Gonzalez Oregon State Penitentiary Salem, OR, Pro Se Plaintiff.

James G. Rice, City of Portland Portland, OR, Attorney for Defendant.

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNNDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation [25] on July 16, 2014, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant Portland Police Bureau's motion to dismiss [23]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt , 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation [25]. Accordingly, Defendant Portland Police Bureau's motion to dismiss [23] is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.