United States District Court, D. Oregon
August 6, 2014
AMINADAD GONZALEZ, Plaintiff,
PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU, JOHN DOE, Portland Police Chief, WILLIAM JOHNSON, HYTHUM ISMAIL, ANDREW HEARST, and CHRISTOPHER LINDSEY, Defendants.
Aminadad Gonzalez Oregon State Penitentiary Salem, OR, Pro Se Plaintiff.
James G. Rice, City of Portland Portland, OR, Attorney for Defendant.
MARCO A. HERNNDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation  on July 16, 2014, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant Portland Police Bureau's motion to dismiss . The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt , 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation . Accordingly, Defendant Portland Police Bureau's motion to dismiss  is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.