United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division.
June 30, 2014
CAROL MADSEN, Plaintiff,
CAROLYN L. COLVIN, Defendant.
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, plaintiff objects to the Findings and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner's finding that plaintiff is not disabled. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (#22) is adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.