Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dosskey v. Feather

United States District Court, D. Oregon

June 17, 2014

PHILLIP GORDON DOSSKEY, Petitioner,
v.
MARION FEATHER, Warden, Respondent.

Phillip Gordon Dosskey, FCI SHERIDAN, Sheridan, OR, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Natalie K. Wight, United States Attorney's Office, Portland, OR, Attorney for Defendant.

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNNDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [18] on May 13, 2014, in which she recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus [2]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt , 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation [18]. Accordingly, Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus [2] is denied with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.