Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hooper v. Jackson County Sheriff's Office

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Medford Division

May 20, 2014

DENNIS RUSSELL HOOPER, Plaintiff,
v.
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, I review legal principles de novo. See Robbins v. Carey , 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007).

I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that plaintiff has failed to state a claim based on the alleged failure to reimburse. I also agree that plaintiff's other claims against the Jackson County Sheriff's Office, liberally construed, should not be dismissed at this time.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#31) is adopted. Defendants' motion to dismiss (#25) is granted as to the claim for failure to reimburse and otherwise denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.