United States District Court, D. Oregon, Medford Division
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with-Magistrate Judge Clarke that plaintiff failed to prosecute this action and failed to comply with a court order. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#116) is adopted. Defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to prosecute (##88, 94), and for failure to comply with a court order (##100, 102) are granted. Defendants' motion to quash subpoena (#110) is granted, and ...