United States District Court, D. Oregon
March 2, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
BRUCE PARKE, Defendant.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#39) on January 8, 2014, in which she recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Defendant has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall , 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Defendant's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation . Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment  is granted. Plaintiff shall file a proposed order on the injunctive relief claim within seven (7) days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.