United States District Court, D. Oregon
MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge.
On November 25, 2013, the Court granted the parties' stipulated motion to remand the Commissioner's determination that Plaintiff was not disabled and was not entitled to disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments. Dkt. 22. The Court remanded the matter back to the agency for further proceedings. Before the Court is Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Dkt. 24.
The EAJA authorizes the payment of attorney's fees to a prevailing party in an action against the United States, unless the government shows that its position in the underlying litigation "was substantially justified." 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Although the EAJA creates a presumption that fees will be awarded to a prevailing party, Congress did not intend fee shifting to be mandatory. Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562, 567 (9th Cir. 1995). The decision to deny EAJA attorney's fees is within the discretion of the court. Id .; Lewis v. Barnhart, 281 F.3d 1081, 1083 (9th Cir. 2002). A social security claimant is the "prevailing party" following a sentence-four remand pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) either for further administrative proceedings or for the payment of benefits. Flores, 49 F.3d at 567-68 (citing Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300 (1993)). Fee awards under the EAJA are paid to the litigant, and not the litigant's attorney, unless the litigant has assigned his or her rights to counsel to receive the fee award. Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010).
The parties stipulated to Plaintiff's requested award of attorney's fees in the amount of $5, 363.42. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's motion and supplemental filing (Dkts. 24 and 27) and agrees with the parties that the EAJA petition is proper and the amount requested is reasonable. Therefore, Plaintiff's application for attorney's fees (Dkt. 24), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $5, 363.42 for attorney's fees and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412. EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets allowed under the Treasury Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Because ...