December 3, 2013
DONTE LAMONT HUNT, Petitioner,
MARION FEATHER, Warden, Respondent.
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 9, 2013. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 (b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines , 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Petitioner has filed timely objections (doc. 13), and respondent declined to file any response brief. I have, therefore, given the file of this case a de novo review. I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 10) granting respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 8). This case is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.