Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lukens v. Portland Police Bureau

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

December 3, 2013

TROY A. LUKENS, Plaintiff,
v.
PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU, Officer AARON SCHMAUTZ, Officer JANE DOE, CITY OF PORTLAND, and MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendants.

Troy A. Lukens, Pro Se, Gresham, OR.

David A. Landrum, City of Portland, Oregon City Attorney's Office, Portland, OR, Attorney for Defendants.

ORDER

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (#36) on November 14, 2013, in which she recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#29). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt , 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#36). Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (#29) is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.