S. AMANDA MARSHALL, United States Attorney, HANNAH HORSLEY, SCOTT ERIK ASPHAUG Assistant United States Attorneys, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Plaintiff.
ERNEST WARREN, JR., Warren & Sugarman, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Defendant.
OPINION AND ORDER
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion (#97) to Withdraw Guilty Plea. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion.
On May 22, 2013, the government filed a Superseding Indictment charging Defendant Ishwar Uttamchandani with two counts of Bank Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 related to an alleged scheme to defraud Washington Mutual Bank "in that defendant... caused Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation to give him money that defendant knew was owed to Washington Mutual Bank" in relation to property at 432 S.E. 12th Avenue and 436 S.E. 12th Avenue, Hillsboro, and two counts of Bank Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 related to an alleged scheme to defraud Washington Mutual Bank "in that defendant... caused Washington Mutual Bank to fund two mortgage loans" related to property at 42450 N.W. Palace Drive, Banks, Oregon.
On July 12, 2013, Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Superseding Indictment pursuant to a Plea Agreement. Specifically, Defendant pled guilty to the following:
On or about April 21, 2005, in the District of Oregon... [Defendant] did execute the material scheme to defraud and to obtain money by false and fraudulent statements, representations, promises, and omissions from Washington Mutual Bank, a federally insured institution, in that [Defendant] caused Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation to give him money that defendant knew was owed to Washington Mutual Bank in the approximate amount of$99, 000 for the loan property at 432 S.E. 12th Hillsboro, Oregon. All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344.
Plea Pet. at 2.
On October 22, 2013, before the Court had sentenced Defendant, Defendant filed a Motion to Withdraw Guilty Plea.
On November 7, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on Defendant's Motion.
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d)(2)(B) provides a Defendant "may withdraw a plea of guilty... after the court accepts the plea, but before it imposes sentence if... the defendant can show a fair and just reason for requesting the withdrawal."
While the defendant is not permitted to withdraw his guilty plea "simply on a lark, " United States v. Hyde, 520 U.S. 670, 676-77 (1997), the "fair and just" standard is generous and must be applied liberally. "Prior to sentencing, the proper inquiry is whether the defendant has shown a fair and ...