November 8, 2013
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER REDDING, Plaintiff,
DR. J. DHALIWAL, et al., Defendants.
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings & Recommendation (#263) on September 10, 2013, in which he recommends the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall , 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings & Recommendation [#263], and therefore, Defendants' motion for summary judgment [#220] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.