Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Barrett v. Rosenbloom

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

October 21, 2013

JACOB BARRETT, Petitioner,
v.
OREGON ATTORNEY GENERAL ELLEN ROSENBLOOM, Respondent.

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL J. McSHANE, District Judge.

Petitioner filed this petition (#2) for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his convictions for Aggravated Murder, Murder, and Robbery. Respondent, in response (#38), moves this Court to deny the petition for failure to timely file under 28 U.S.C. § 2244. Judge Thomas M. Coffin issued a Findings and Recommendation (F & R) on August 28, 2013. This matter is now before this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Because no objections to the F & R were timely filed, this court reviews only the legal principles de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1988). Upon review, this Court finds find no error in Judge Coffin's F & R (#27).[1]

CONCLUSION

This Court ADOPTS Judge Coffin's F & R (#52) in full. Petitioner Jacob Barrett's petition (#2) is DENIED and this proceeding is DISMISSED as time-barred.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.