PATRICIA J. WHITT, Plaintiff,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES A. REDDEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Patricia Whitt ("Whitt") brings this action to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying her claim for disability insurance benefits ("DIB"). For the reasons set forth below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and this matter is dismissed.
Whitt filed her application for DIB benefits in January 2009. She has a high school education, and has worked as a bank teller. Whitt alleges disability since July 11, 2008, due to "heart attack, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, hypertension, post traumatic stress disorder, tendinitis, tinnitus, major depressive disorder, and fatty liver. Tr. 159. Whitt was 51 years old on her alleged onset date. Her application was denied initially and upon reconsideration. A hearing was held in February 2011. The Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") found her not disabled. Whitt's request for review was denied, making the ALJ's decision the final decision of the Commissioner.
The ALJ found Whitt had the medically determinable severe impairments of fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis of the hands, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Tr. 23.
The ALJ found that Whitt's impairments did not meet or medically equal one of the listed impairments in 20 C.P.R. Part 404, Subpart P, App. 1. Id.
The ALJ determined that Whitt retained the residual functional capacity ("RFC") to perform light work, with no more than occasional contact with the general public. Tr. 25.
The ALJ found Whitt unable to perform her past relevant work. Tr. 36.
The ALJ found Whitt was not disabled because she could perform the representative occupations of motel maid and small products assembler. Tr. 37.
The medical records accurately set out Whitt's medical history as it relates to her claim for benefits. The court has carefully reviewed the extensive medical record, and the parties are familiar with it. Accordingly, the details of those medical records will be set out below only as they are relevant to the issues before the court.
Whitt contends that the ALJ erred by: (1) improperly rejecting lay testimony; and (2) ...