Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Murphy v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

May 31, 2013

SHERRI MURPHY, Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration[1] Defendant.

RORY LINERUD, Salem, OR, Attorney for Plaintiff.

S. AMANDA MARSHALL, United States Attorney, ADRIAN L. BROWN, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, OR.

DAVID MORADO, Regional Chief Counsel, FRANCO L. BECIA, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Social Security Administration, Seattle, WA, Attorneys for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Sherri Murphy seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) in which she denied Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. This Court has jurisdiction to review the Commissioner's final decision pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g).

Following a review of the record, the Court AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY

Plaintiff filed her applications for SSI and DIB on May 6, 2008, and alleged a disability onset date of July 13, 2007. Tr. 127.[2] Plaintiff's claims were denied initially and on reconsideration. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) held a hearing on October 5, 2010. Tr. 12-22. At the hearing Plaintiff was represented by an attorney. Plaintiff and a vocational expert (VE) testified.

The ALJ issued a decision on February 4, 2011, in which he found Plaintiff was not disabled because she could perform a limited range of sedentary work. Tr. 21. That decision became the final decision of the Commissioner on May 10, 2012, when the Appeals Council denied Plaintiff's request for review. Tr. 1-3.

On June 22, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court seeking review of the Commissioner's decision.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was born on May 24, 1966, and was 44 years old at the time of the October 2010 hearing. Tr. 12, 21. Plaintiff has a General Education Diploma. Tr. 39. Plaintiff has past relevant work experience as a care-giver. Tr. 20.

Plaintiff alleges disability due to a back ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.