May 20, 2013
JERARDO RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff,
DENISE G. FJORDBECK, Asst. Atty. General; JOHN R. KROGER, Atty. General; MARY H. WILLIAMS, Solicitor General; HARDY MYERS, Atty. Gen.; LEIGH A. SALMON, Asst. Atty. General; JAMES K. HEIN, OSB No. 054621; KATHERINE VON TER STEGGE, Asst. Atty. General; KRISTIN A. WINGS, Asst. Atty. General, Defendants.
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubel issued Findings and Recommendation (#5) on March 22, 2013, in which he recommends the Court dismiss this matter with prejudice and without service on Defendants. Plaintiff filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 (b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ( en banc ).
This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Bubel's Findings and Recommendation (#5) and, therefore, DISMISSES this matter with prejudice and without service on Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.