May 16, 2013
JASON CAVEZZA, Petitioner,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 9, 2013. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc. , 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Petitioner has filed objections. I have, therefore, given de novo review of Magistrate Judge Coffin's rulings.
I find no error.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that I adopt Magistrate Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation filed April 9, 2013 in its entirety.